On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 09:42:07PM +0200, Leif Neland wrote:
> > >
> > > Here's my thoughts...for the record, I'm weakly opposed to regen-ing
> > > *.TXT versions: First, I don't want to bloat the repository with oodles
> > > of builds to the *.TXT files. If we do this, it ought to be be fairly
> > > infrequently, like maybe once or twice a month.
> >
> > Bad idea..
> >
> > RELNOTES, HARDWARE etc are things that should be up to date. Not
> > 'a bit uptodate' or 'slightly outdated'.
> >
> > I really would not like to see the idea being bloated by going this route.
> >
> As UPDATING may contain information nessecary to run make world, it can't be built
>by make world.
> Chicken and egg, methinks...
Possibly. But I was not refering to UPDATING.
--
| / o / / _ Arnhem, The Netherlands email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|/|/ / / /( (_) Bulte Powered by FreeBSD/alpha http://www.freebsd.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
