On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 10:27:14 -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 01:23:44PM -0400, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > > > Okay. So it sounds like there's a "shim" to libedit which would be > > the API replacement for libreadline. Could we call that something > > cute like 'libreadlinele' ('le' for 'libedit') or 'libeditrl', but > > leave libreadline as a separate port? > > How about 'libedit'? :) I could live with that; it's just some > makefile changes. I vote this too. We don't need stripped down libreadline under 'libreadline' name pretend to be full version (f.e. for autoconf, etc.) -- Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Garrett Wollman
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Kris Kennaway
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Kris Kennaway
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Andrey A. Chernov
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Andrey A. Chernov
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Garance A Drosihn
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Kris Kennaway
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Garance A Drosihn
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Kris Kennaway
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Andrey A. Chernov
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Maxim Sobolev
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Terry Lambert
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Maxim Sobolev
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Terry Lambert
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Kris Kennaway
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Terry Lambert
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Garance A Drosihn
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Kris Kennaway
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Terry Lambert
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Kris Kennaway