On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 10:27:14 -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 01:23:44PM -0400, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> > Okay.  So it sounds like there's a "shim" to libedit which would be
> > the API replacement for libreadline.  Could we call that something
> > cute like 'libreadlinele' ('le' for 'libedit') or 'libeditrl', but
> > leave libreadline as a separate port?
> How about 'libedit'? :) I could live with that; it's just some
> makefile changes.

I vote this too. We don't need stripped down libreadline under
'libreadline' name pretend to be full version (f.e. for autoconf, etc.)

Andrey A. Chernov

PGP signature

Reply via email to