Terry Lambert wrote:

> "Andrey A. Chernov" wrote:
> > > > Okay.  So it sounds like there's a "shim" to libedit which would be
> > > > the API replacement for libreadline.  Could we call that something
> > > > cute like 'libreadlinele' ('le' for 'libedit') or 'libeditrl', but
> > > > leave libreadline as a separate port?
> > >
> > > How about 'libedit'? :) I could live with that; it's just some
> > > makefile changes.
> >
> > I vote this too. We don't need stripped down libreadline under
> > 'libreadline' name pretend to be full version (f.e. for autoconf, etc.)
> The cryptography libraries have set a precedent here.  I
> could argue the same thing about the presence of a full DES
> in libcrypt.

I failed to understand what you are trying to say. Do you mean that we have
to follow a bad practice set by that precedent at any costs, or I parsed your
message incorrectly?


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to