Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> > > I vote this too. We don't need stripped down libreadline under
> > > 'libreadline' name pretend to be full version (f.e. for autoconf, etc.)
> >
> > The cryptography libraries have set a precedent here.  I
> > could argue the same thing about the presence of a full DES
> > in libcrypt.
> I failed to understand what you are trying to say. Do you mean that we have
> to follow a bad practice set by that precedent at any costs, or I parsed your
> message incorrectly?

I'm saying "fix it both places, or it obviously is not a
sufficient justification for a decision".

Or to put it another way "if you are willing to live with
it in one place, why not two?".

-- Terry

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to