Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > > I vote this too. We don't need stripped down libreadline under > > > 'libreadline' name pretend to be full version (f.e. for autoconf, etc.) > > > > The cryptography libraries have set a precedent here. I > > could argue the same thing about the presence of a full DES > > in libcrypt. > > I failed to understand what you are trying to say. Do you mean that we have > to follow a bad practice set by that precedent at any costs, or I parsed your > message incorrectly? I'm saying "fix it both places, or it obviously is not a sufficient justification for a decision". Or to put it another way "if you are willing to live with it in one place, why not two?". -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Andrey A. Chernov
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Garance A Drosihn
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Kris Kennaway
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Garance A Drosihn
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Kris Kennaway
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Andrey A. Chernov
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Maxim Sobolev
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Terry Lambert
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Maxim Sobolev
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Terry Lambert
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Kris Kennaway
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Terry Lambert
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Garance A Drosihn
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Kris Kennaway
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Terry Lambert
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Kris Kennaway
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Erik Trulsson
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Terry Lambert
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline David O'Brien
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Kris Kennaway