"Andrey A. Chernov" wrote: > > > Okay. So it sounds like there's a "shim" to libedit which would be > > > the API replacement for libreadline. Could we call that something > > > cute like 'libreadlinele' ('le' for 'libedit') or 'libeditrl', but > > > leave libreadline as a separate port? > > > > How about 'libedit'? :) I could live with that; it's just some > > makefile changes. > > I vote this too. We don't need stripped down libreadline under > 'libreadline' name pretend to be full version (f.e. for autoconf, etc.) The cryptography libraries have set a precedent here. I could argue the same thing about the presence of a full DES in libcrypt. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Kris Kennaway
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Andrey A. Chernov
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Andrey A. Chernov
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Garance A Drosihn
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Kris Kennaway
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Garance A Drosihn
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Kris Kennaway
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Andrey A. Chernov
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Maxim Sobolev
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Terry Lambert
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Maxim Sobolev
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Terry Lambert
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Kris Kennaway
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Terry Lambert
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Garance A Drosihn
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Kris Kennaway
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Terry Lambert
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Kris Kennaway
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Erik Trulsson
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Terry Lambert