"Andrey A. Chernov" wrote:
> > > Okay.  So it sounds like there's a "shim" to libedit which would be
> > > the API replacement for libreadline.  Could we call that something
> > > cute like 'libreadlinele' ('le' for 'libedit') or 'libeditrl', but
> > > leave libreadline as a separate port?
> >
> > How about 'libedit'? :) I could live with that; it's just some
> > makefile changes.
> I vote this too. We don't need stripped down libreadline under
> 'libreadline' name pretend to be full version (f.e. for autoconf, etc.)

The cryptography libraries have set a precedent here.  I
could argue the same thing about the presence of a full DES
in libcrypt.

-- Terry

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to