In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Greg Lehey writes:
>On Wednesday, 15 August 2001 at 19:17:47 +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ju
>> lian Elischer writes:
>>> the lack of subdirectory support is a pitty.
>> There is support for subdirectories:
>>      ls -la /dev/fd
>What am I supposed to see there?  I get three character devices, all
>mounted on /dev directly.

Uhm, have you forgotten how ls(1) works ?

Try this then:

        ls -lad /dev/fd /dev/fd/[012]

>In view of the fact that this thread is about deficiencies in your
>devfs, this is particularly uncalled for.  One of the reasons that
>Julian's devfs never got debugged was that you had made it very clear
>from the start that it would be removed.

History being rewritten eh ?  I spent 3+ years trying to argue his
DEVFS should be made default!

Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
[EMAIL PROTECTED]         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to