On Sat, 06 Oct 2001 12:15:23 MST, Terry Lambert wrote: > I'm interested in the UUCP code only in so far as it is an > unnecessary -- and so far, undefended by you -- change to > code that's working fine for other people. The change is not undefended. It's been made very clear from the beginning that the security officer team sees the UUCP software as a security liability, and would like the software "relegated" to ports so as to limit the impact of vulnerabilities. I don't see how your (or Kris's) insistence on continuing this thread can benefit the community. The rest of us don't care about your ego, nor about Kris's. You guys are both being wankers by showing no respect for the time of the readers of this list. Move on already. Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: PATCHES for Kris Kennaway ... Giorgos Keramidas
- Re: PATCHES for Kris Kennaway ... Warner Losh
- Re: PATCHES for Kris Kennaway ... Peter Wemm
- Re: PATCHES for Kris Kennaway ... Terry Lambert
- Re: PATCHES for Kris Kennaway ... Doug Barton
- Re: PATCHES for Kris Kennaway ... Nik Clayton
- Re: PATCHES for Kris Kennaway ... Warner Losh
- Re: PATCHES for Kris Kennaway ... Kris Kennaway
- Re: PATCHES for Kris Kennaway ... Terry Lambert
- Re: PATCHES for Kris Kennaway ... John Baldwin
- Re: PATCHES for Kris Kennaway ... Sheldon Hearn
- Re: PATCHES for Kris Kennaway ... Terry Lambert
- Re: uucp user shell and home d... David O'Brien
- Re: uucp user shell and home d... Terry Lambert
- Re: uucp user shell and home d... Nik Clayton
- Re: uucp user shell and home d... Bernd Walter
- Re: uucp user shell and home directory Blaz Zupan
- Re: uucp user shell and home directory Mike Bristow
- Re: uucp user shell and home directory Terry Lambert
- Re: uucp user shell and home directory Nik Clayton
- Re: uucp user shell and home directory Lyndon Nerenberg