On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 6:12 PM, Wojciech Puchar <woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote: >> No! Unless you think that fBSd is the only functional/reliable OS. If > > for my needs it's actually true. Only FreeBSD meets my requirements.
<slide> ok . . . </slide> > >> Wojciech, I, like many others who have responded on this thread, >> appreciate much of the help that you provide on this list. You seem to >> fail (for whatever reason) to understand that your opinionated >> comments may need to be better thought out. If you were the "monitor" >> of your utopian mailing list, what would you have done with your > > Of course - you already decided about "utopian". no argument for this. > >> response to the OP? > > as i said (another example you don't read what i write carefully) i would > first define strict rules of posting. > > and then moderators should only execute them. If i would be moderator i > could only do this, or stop being moderator. > > If rules would allow any discussion if moderator should or should not delete > post, then rules are wrong and must be fixed. > > moderator can not have any power to resolve personal things through it. I read what you posted "carefully." I'm asking you to play pretend . . . if you were the moderator of the list you suggest, do you think that the response you gave to the OP, as a non-developer, is acceptable. That is, do you think that that those who have no responsibility as far as what is done with $$ donated to the fBSD cause (i.e., you) should respond to to those who wish to donate? For a minute there, I was hoping that it was a language issue (BTW - I think your English is quite good), but now I think it's an attention issue. > -- www.nealhogan.net www.lambdaserver.com _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"