Peter Risdon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robert Huff wrote: > > >Peter Risdon writes: > > > >> I suppose what I'm driving at is whether the RELENG_4 branch sees > >> many commits that are likely to be problematic. > >> > > In general, no. > > On the other hand ... think of this as a Murphy's Law scenario: > >if you automate, it _will_ break horribly two days before some > >absolutely critical deadline. > > > > QED
I must be "out of touch" with my jargon ... What's "QED"? -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
