On Tue, Jun 08, 2004, Kent Stewart wrote:
>On Tuesday 08 June 2004 09:36 am, Bill Moran wrote:
>> Peter Risdon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Robert Huff wrote:
>> > >Peter Risdon writes:
>> > >> I suppose what I'm driving at is whether the RELENG_4 branch
>> > >> sees many commits that are likely to be problematic.
>> > >
>> > >  In general, no.
>> > >  On the other hand ... think of this as a Murphy's Law scenario:
>> > >if you automate, it _will_ break horribly two days before some
>> > >absolutely critical deadline.
>> >
>> > QED
>> I must be "out of touch" with my jargon ...
>> What's "QED"?
>I remember seeing that  at the end of mathematical proofs at the 
>University where the professor was too lazy to finish their 
>documentation. It was much more fitting here :).

The original Latin is ``Quod Erat Demonstrandum'', translates to that was
demonstrated (about as much as I remember from five years of Latin).

INTERNET:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC
UUCP:              camco!bill   PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way
FAX:           (206) 232-9186   Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676

You need only reflect that one of the best ways to get yourself a
reputation as a dangerous citizen these days is to go about repeating
the very phrases which our founding fathers used in the struggle for
        -- Charles A. Beard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to