On 10 Feb 2014, at 04:18 , Wojciech A. Koszek <wkos...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On nie, lut 09, 2014 at 02:59:06 +0100, Juergen Lock wrote: >> On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 02:56:24AM +0000, Wojciech A. Koszek wrote: >>> On sob, lut 08, 2014 at 09:45:46 +0100, Juergen Lock wrote: >>>> On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 08:49:28PM +0000, Wojciech A. Koszek wrote: >>>>> On pi??, lut 07, 2014 at 09:12:08 +0100, Juergen Lock wrote: >>>>>> Hi! >>>>>> >>>>>> This came up on irc so I tried to build a linux libusb port (before >>>>>> I learned about ports/146895), mine uses linux_base-gentoo-stage3 >>>>>> like linux_kdump with a src/lib/libusb head snapshot so it's more >>>>>> up to date than wkoszek's build (ports/146895), and it's really >>>>>> easy to update it again. Also maybe it can be used as linux >>>>>> libusb-1.0.so too; I didn't actually test it tho. >>>>>> >>>>>> Should this be committed? Is wkoszek's version better since it >>>>>> also builds on < 10.x? Comments welcome... >>>>>> >>>>>> wkoszek's version: >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=146895 >>>>>> >>>>>> Mine: >>>>>> >>>>>> http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/tmp/linux_libusb.shar >>>>>> >>>>>> Distfile: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/tmp/distfiles/linux_libusb-11.0r261448.tar.bz2 >>>>>> >>>>>> 10/amd64 package: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/tmp/packages/10amd64/linux_libusb-11.0r261448.txz >>>>>> >>>>>> (built via: >>>>>> >>>>>> poudriere bulk -v -j 10amd64 -p custom devel/linux_libusb >>>>>> >>>>>> - btw for some reason the dependency emulators/linux_base-gentoo-stage3 >>>>>> doesn't build for 10i386 in poudriere bulk, I get a pkg segfault. bapt >>>>>> Cc'd...) >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Juergen, >>>> Hi! >>>>> >>>>> What would be the reason for this update? >>>>> >>>>> My stuff may be out of date, but it was all tested and working. I verified >>>>> it with Linux'ish lsusb(1) and USB-based FPGA JTAG programmer, for which >>>>> this stuff was written. >>>>> >>>> I was just thinking an updated version may be useful, but if it's >>>> already working for everyone maybe less so... >>>> >>>> Or would it work as a linux libusb-1.0.so too? I know the libusb 1.0 >>>> stuff added some functions since 9.x at least... maybe hps would know >>>> (Cc'd.) >>>> >>> >>> Juergen, >>> >>> I think this package is useful and is looking for maintainer, so if you have >>> time and energy, I'm OK with upgrading it, but I suggest testing it first. >>> Bjoern might be interested too. >>> >> You mean bz@ ? Cc'd. I tried testing lsusb from debian sid but it printed >> nothing, neither with my nor with your older version, but maybe it's just >> `too new' for our current linuxolator. > > I assume you have at least 1 USB device while trying this. I don't remember > exactly, but while trying within Linuxolator, you may need devfs/procfs to > be mounted under Linuxolator's root directory. My understanding and from looking at trace is that if we cannot find it in /compat/linux we ale search in /; so no need for an extra mount unless maybe you run chrooted. > So you'll have to figure this out. > > Does it return with 0 exit code? > > If not, lsusb should be simple enough to let you place printf() all over the > place and understand out when it's failing. For me the problem was a clock_gettime() call in the libusb which my glibc did not provide. That made all things fail (silently) until I used linux “rtld" tracing to see the unresolved symbol from libusb/the commercial 3rd party software dynamically loading libusb. — Bjoern A. Zeeb ????????? ??? ??????? ??????: '??? ??? ???? ?????? ??????? ?? ?? ??????? ??????? ??? ????? ????? ???? ?????? ?? ????? ????', ????????? ?????????, "??? ????? ?? ?????", ?.??? _______________________________________________ freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-usb-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"