You're welcome, yes I guess it's safer to keep them in standalone servers
for the moment.
For information I did try :

FreeBSD 8 i386 paravirtualized on :

   - Xen 3.4.2 with a 2.6.32 Linux kernel
   - Xen 4.0 with a 2.6.32.12 Linux kernel

FreeBSD 9 beta i386 paravirtualized on :

   -
   - Xen 3.4.2 with a 2.6.32 Linux kernel
   - Xen 4.0 with a 2.6.32.12 Linux kerne


Configuration with mono CPU and 512/1024 Mo RAM, Disks on Dom0 LVM
partitions.
Plateforms : Dell T610, Dell R200, Dell R210.

Cordialement,

ω³ Omega Cube
Guillaume S.
Network and System Security Architect
Web : http://www.omegacube.fr
Address :
Hôtel Technologique - BP 100
Technopôle de Château Gombert
13382 Marseille Cedex 13


2010/6/20 Pandu Poluan <pa...@poluan.info>

> Ahh... Thanks for the answer. I guess we will keep the
> performance-bound FreeBSD servers standalone then.
>
> Rgds,
>
> On 2010-06-19, Guillaume Seigneuret <g...@omegacube.fr> wrote:
> > As far as I could try, FreeBSD 8 paravitualized is not suitable for
> > production use.
> > It crashes under stress.
> >
> > Cordialement,
> >
> > Guillaume Seigneuret
> >
> >
> >
> > Network and System Security Architect
> > Web : http://www.omegacube.fr
> > Address :
> > Hôtel Technologique - BP 100
> > Technopôle de Château Gombert
> > 13382 Marseille Cedex 13
> >
> >
> > -----Message d'origine-----
> > De : owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org]
> De
> > la part de Pandu Poluan
> > Envoyé : samedi 19 juin 2010 07:53
> > À : freebsd-xen@freebsd.org
> > Objet : Paravirtualized FreeBSD 8 Guest on Citrix XenServer 5.5/5.6 Host
> >
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I'm just trying to confirm: Is it true that FreeBSD 8's support for
> > Paravirtualized Guest on XenServer still experimental/beta?
> >
> > Because we need to make sure that FreeBSD-based *production* servers
> > can be paravirtualized on the xenserver hosts -- performance reasons.
> >
> > That said, I've tried installing FreeBSD 8 in HVM mode, seems to work
> > okay -- might be suitable for the 1 or 2 servers that does not need
> > highest performance.
> >
> > PS: I'm not really familiar with FreeBSD, though I am familiar with
> > Linux. Some hand-holding will be appreciated :-)
> >
> > Rgds,
> > --
> > Pandu E Poluan - IT Optimizer
> > My website: http://pandu.poluan.info/
> > _______________________________________________
> > freebsd-xen@freebsd.org mailing list
> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xen
> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-xen-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
> >
> >
>
> --
> Sent from my mobile device
>
> --
> Pandu E Poluan - IT Optimizer
> My website: http://pandu.poluan.info/
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-xen@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xen
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-xen-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>
_______________________________________________
freebsd-xen@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xen
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-xen-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to