Yeah... as I've said, i used HVM and i only spoke about my expierience with that :) So no PVM...
tjado Am 21.06.2010 02:14, schrieb Adrian Chadd: > As I've said before, the FreeBSD-Xen PVM code requires someone with > the time and inclination to pick it up and maintain it. The commercial > focus of FreeBSD/Xen users at the moment seems to be on HVM support > rather than full PVM support. > > > > Adrian > > On 21 June 2010 01:07, Tjado Mäcke <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I didn't do any tests in general. I used for a while FreeBSD HVM (and >> other os guests...) under xen-3.2.1. There I got problems that VM's >> react very slowly under ZFS/UFS I/O stress (tar of logs, etc...) till I >> need to reboot the guest. It was under FreeBSD 7.2 with ZFS beta but 8.0 >> didn't worked with that xen/kernel. The last weeks I tried Xen 4.0.0 but >> tap:aio and tap:tapdisk:aio cause complete host kernel crashes under I/O >> stress (dd if /dev/zero...). With Xen-4.0.1-rc3-pre I haven't these >> problems, FreeBSD 8 is working (so booting works ;) and states/times >> seems a lot more healthier. >> >> Softs: Webserver with a top 5000 (alexa) site (high db access - cached, >> some I/O because of downloads), high threaded game server (for wc3), >> mail server and other webservers/stuff... >> >> Am 20.06.2010 18:00, schrieb Guillaume Seigneuret: >> >>> Could you tell us what did you do to test the stability ? >>> Softs running on it, who many time and with who many users using it ? >>> >>> Thanks by advance. >>> >>> Cordialement, >>> >>> Guillaume Seigneuret >>> >>> >>> >>> Network and System Security Architect >>> Web : http://www.omegacube.fr >>> Address : >>> Hôtel Technologique - BP 100 >>> Technopôle de Château Gombert >>> 13382 Marseille Cedex 13 >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xen To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
