I did try with Xen 4.0.0. But more stable doesn't meens "suitable for production use" ... I think the FreeBSD team has to work on its kernel to make it stable under paravirtualized environment. It's not really a question of Xen kernel version.
Cordialement, Guillaume Seigneuret Network and System Security Architect Web : http://www.omegacube.fr Address : Hôtel Technologique - BP 100 Technopôle de Château Gombert 13382 Marseille Cedex 13 -----Message d'origine----- De : Tjado Mäcke [mailto:[email protected]] Envoyé : dimanche 20 juin 2010 16:28 À : Guillaume Seigneuret Cc : Pandu Poluan; [email protected] Objet : Re: Paravirtualized FreeBSD 8 Guest on Citrix XenServer 5.5/5.6 Host Hi, which version did you use of 4.0? For me, 4.0.1-rc3-pre runs more stable than 4.0.0. Do you have some more information about the FreeBSD pv? Maybe i will try this howto: http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=10268 tjado Am 20.06.2010 12:00, schrieb Guillaume Seigneuret: > You're welcome, yes I guess it's safer to keep them in standalone servers > for the moment. > For information I did try : > > FreeBSD 8 i386 paravirtualized on : > > - Xen 3.4.2 with a 2.6.32 Linux kernel > - Xen 4.0 with a 2.6.32.12 Linux kernel > > FreeBSD 9 beta i386 paravirtualized on : > > - > - Xen 3.4.2 with a 2.6.32 Linux kernel > - Xen 4.0 with a 2.6.32.12 Linux kerne > > > Configuration with mono CPU and 512/1024 Mo RAM, Disks on Dom0 LVM > partitions. > Plateforms : Dell T610, Dell R200, Dell R210. > > Cordialement, > > _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xen To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
