I did try with Xen 4.0.0.
But more stable doesn't meens "suitable for production use" ...
I think the FreeBSD team has to work on its kernel to make it stable under 
paravirtualized environment.
It's not really a question of Xen kernel version.

Cordialement,

Guillaume Seigneuret



Network and System Security Architect
Web : http://www.omegacube.fr
Address :
Hôtel Technologique - BP 100
Technopôle de Château Gombert
13382 Marseille Cedex 13

-----Message d'origine-----
De : Tjado Mäcke [mailto:tjado.ml.freebsd-...@maecke.net] 
Envoyé : dimanche 20 juin 2010 16:28
À : Guillaume Seigneuret
Cc : Pandu Poluan; freebsd-xen@freebsd.org
Objet : Re: Paravirtualized FreeBSD 8 Guest on Citrix XenServer 5.5/5.6 Host

Hi,

which version did you use of 4.0? For me, 4.0.1-rc3-pre runs more stable
than 4.0.0.
Do you have some more information about the FreeBSD pv? Maybe i will try
this howto: http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=10268

tjado

Am 20.06.2010 12:00, schrieb Guillaume Seigneuret:
> You're welcome, yes I guess it's safer to keep them in standalone servers
> for the moment.
> For information I did try :
>
> FreeBSD 8 i386 paravirtualized on :
>
>    - Xen 3.4.2 with a 2.6.32 Linux kernel
>    - Xen 4.0 with a 2.6.32.12 Linux kernel
>
> FreeBSD 9 beta i386 paravirtualized on :
>
>    -
>    - Xen 3.4.2 with a 2.6.32 Linux kernel
>    - Xen 4.0 with a 2.6.32.12 Linux kerne
>
>
> Configuration with mono CPU and 512/1024 Mo RAM, Disks on Dom0 LVM
> partitions.
> Plateforms : Dell T610, Dell R200, Dell R210.
>
> Cordialement,
>
>   


_______________________________________________
freebsd-xen@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xen
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-xen-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to