I mean stable in a general way not for FreeBSD (didn't tried out it in
PV yet).

tjado

Am 20.06.2010 17:54, schrieb Guillaume Seigneuret:
> I did try with Xen 4.0.0.
> But more stable doesn't meens "suitable for production use" ...
> I think the FreeBSD team has to work on its kernel to make it stable under 
> paravirtualized environment.
> It's not really a question of Xen kernel version.
>
> Cordialement,
>
> Guillaume Seigneuret
>
>
>
> Network and System Security Architect
> Web : http://www.omegacube.fr
> Address :
> Hôtel Technologique - BP 100
> Technopôle de Château Gombert
> 13382 Marseille Cedex 13
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Tjado Mäcke [mailto:tjado.ml.freebsd-...@maecke.net] 
> Envoyé : dimanche 20 juin 2010 16:28
> À : Guillaume Seigneuret
> Cc : Pandu Poluan; freebsd-xen@freebsd.org
> Objet : Re: Paravirtualized FreeBSD 8 Guest on Citrix XenServer 5.5/5.6 Host
>
> Hi,
>
> which version did you use of 4.0? For me, 4.0.1-rc3-pre runs more stable
> than 4.0.0.
> Do you have some more information about the FreeBSD pv? Maybe i will try
> this howto: http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=10268
>
> tjado
>
> Am 20.06.2010 12:00, schrieb Guillaume Seigneuret:
>   
>> You're welcome, yes I guess it's safer to keep them in standalone servers
>> for the moment.
>> For information I did try :
>>
>> FreeBSD 8 i386 paravirtualized on :
>>
>>    - Xen 3.4.2 with a 2.6.32 Linux kernel
>>    - Xen 4.0 with a 2.6.32.12 Linux kernel
>>
>> FreeBSD 9 beta i386 paravirtualized on :
>>
>>    -
>>    - Xen 3.4.2 with a 2.6.32 Linux kernel
>>    - Xen 4.0 with a 2.6.32.12 Linux kerne
>>
>>
>> Configuration with mono CPU and 512/1024 Mo RAM, Disks on Dom0 LVM
>> partitions.
>> Plateforms : Dell T610, Dell R200, Dell R210.
>>
>> Cordialement,
>>
>>   
>>     
>
>   

_______________________________________________
freebsd-xen@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xen
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-xen-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to