Follow-up Comment #5, bug #16065 (project freeciv): > Checked; if this is just a documentation of current code > state, I disagree with your flag listings. If it was a > proposal, disregard this...
Thanks for the check! I did the patch the first time around and there were errors (see gna patch #1600); so this time I asked for help ;-) The analysis is after the attached patch is applied. So the two differences are due to changes in the code. Furthermore I corrected the logic in ai_military_attack_barbarian(). I will wait if somebody else comments before applying the patch but latest next weekend. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <http://gna.org/bugs/?16065> _______________________________________________ Nachricht geschickt von/durch Gna! http://gna.org/ _______________________________________________ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev