Follow-up Comment #13, patch #4374 (project freeciv):

> Arguably we should either fix qt.m4 or remove it from svn (in
> which case I'll keep a local copy).

I didn't do that immediately when switching to Qt4 to Qt5 in S2_5 since there
is some code changes that may lead us (mostly meaning Mir3x) to decide that we
will get best Qt-client for 2.5 by reverting back to Qt4.
Of course there's no future for Qt4 in TRUNK, so qt.m4 could have been removed
there, but I think it's easiest to remove it from both branches at the same
time (same ticket).


Reply to this item at:


  Message sent via/by Gna!

Freeciv-dev mailing list

Reply via email to