My two cents,
tom ehlert escreveu:
a) remove all components that don't work like
DEFRAG's that don't do anything
DEFRAG's that thrash FAT32 because they don't understand FAT32
Agreed. No dangerous sw should be in the standard didtribution.
b) decide which chkdsk to use; providing 2,3 or more is as
unuserfrienly as possible - if YOU can't decide which one to use,
how's a user supposed to choose ?
I use one that works 100% and I have tested:
dosfsck -af C:
and the version I used (indicated by someone here in the list, sorry I
don't remember who) is 60896 bytes 15aug05 02:26 (not so sure about the
date, it could have changed with the download)
c) make it a DOS distribution ( ~1-2 MB), not a pile of each and
every more or less useful or useless programm that happens to
work on freedos; provide a hyperlink for [more packets]
I agree. But I am making my own distro, which just shows that I disagree ;-)
For example, to my mind the following two would be essential:
- INT-2E backdoor
certainly not a showstopper, even if it might be useful for someone
Could someone remind me of what is this problem?
---
And one more: I vagely remember a problem about "Abort or Retry..." is
is solved? What did it affect and was it a kernel or freecom problem?
Alain
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
Freedos-devel mailing list
Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
