On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 8:31 PM, Travis Siegel <tsie...@softcon.com> wrote:
> Another thing I wonder, is why it is that nobody has built anything
> that allows executing of multiple oses on a single computer, using
> one cpu core for each os, thereby allowing each os to run natively on
> it's own cpu, thus eliminating the need to vertualize anything
> (except perhaps output and input), but then each and every os would
> have it's own cpu, and all of them would run at full native speeds.
> Then you could have as many oses running as you have cpu cores to
> handle them.
> (still waiting) I guess someone will do it eventually, but until they
> do, I'll stick with my osx machine, and my several dos boxes
> scattered everywhere. :)
>
>
For this, I think co-Linux is an example. It runs in parallel with other OS.
Although I don't know how it shares resources, whether all through host OS
or just partially.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Doing More with Less: The Next Generation Virtual Desktop
What are the key obstacles that have prevented many mid-market businesses
from deploying virtual desktops? How do next-generation virtual desktops
provide companies an easier-to-deploy, easier-to-manage and more affordable
virtual desktop model.http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51426474/
_______________________________________________
Freedos-devel mailing list
Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
