Hey all, I don't really have a horse in this race since I don't really contribute to the FD distribution, but as a developer of a tool getting relegated to the "other" CD, does make me a bit sad... I was surprised and quite proud to see DOG still being part of the main CD! :D However, I do realize that I'm working on a niche of a niche and no-one who is installing FreeDOS to play old games is going to even look at DOG. It was cool to have it on the main CD, though! :D
Carry on, and keep up the good work! --Wolf -- |\_ | .\---. / ,__/ / /Wolf <wolf+...@bergenheim.net>_ On Sat, Sep 28, 2024 at 5:54 AM Jerome Shidel via Freedos-devel < freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > > > > On Sep 27, 2024, at 11:38 PM, Jim Hall via Freedos-devel < > freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > > [..] > > This should be an interesting test release, thanks! This is a good step > forward for 2410, we can move the other package groups for 2411, and that > will be another point of comparison. > > Your welcome. > > That was my thoughts as well. > No need to do everything all at once. ;-) > > While I was doing it, I had a some thoughts on a lot of the stuff. Things > like… Do we need to have all of those Web Browsers on the release media. > Should we really have some of the small packages that duplicate > functionality provided by more popular packages. Maybe the Archivers group > should be changed to Compression and move UPX from Level into it. The > Utilities Group has kind-of been a dumping ground for all packages that did > not fit into one of the other groups. Maybe it should be split up. And so > on…. > > But that is all stuff we can decide on later. > > :-) > > Jerome > > _______________________________________________ > Freedos-devel mailing list > Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel >
_______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
