> PS: You could also compare EDRDOS+UIDE with FreeDOS+UIDE. IIRC I tested some caches in the past. Result: NO SPEEDUP at all for a single big file.
> the data are useless :( NOT that bad ... > unless dos386 describes what program(s) he used My silly FATPLUS.EXE maybe ??? > on what hardware to produce these results Almost documented: ATA-33 and XDMA > does not specify which int21 functions Block size 56 KiB | AH=$3F AH=$40 ??? http://www.ctyme.com/intr/rb-2783.htm Hadn't known there would be more ... > Shouldn't it be sufficient to seek to the desired size (as offset), then > do a write with length zero there? (Writing with length zero extends or > truncates the file to the current seek offset.) Not yet tested the sparse hack ... my bad :-( -- ~~~ wow ~~~ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 _______________________________________________ Freedos-kernel mailing list Freedos-kernel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-kernel
