On 15.7.2015 09:44, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 12:49:23PM -0400, John Dennis wrote:
>> On 07/14/2015 12:03 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Is anyone using repos
>>> https://jdennis.fedorapeople.org/ipa-devel/
>>> ?
>>>
>>> AFAIK nobody in Brno is seriously using it but I'm not sure about people
>>> outside the Brno.
>>>
>>> Could we use COPR instead and get out of builder business? Upcoming lab
>>> maintenance window could be a good time to do that.
>>
>> I would love to get out of the builder business and I suspect Nalin would as
>> well [1]. The question came up in our Monday meeting as well. Nobody seem to
>> know if anyone was using these builds and why we weren't using COPR. The
> 
> The Fedora infra admins should be able to provide HTTP logs for the
> repo, if you needs some numbers about potential usage.

That is a good idea! I got logs from Fedora admins and as far as I can tell,
in the last month there were only 7 RPM downloads and nothing else.

The 7 hits I found was for
/ipa-devel/rhel/6/x86_64/os/sssd-1.13.1-0.20150813T1121Zgit137d5dd.el6.i686.rpm 
and
other packages from the same version.

I did not find any hits for IPA packages at all. All the remaining traffic
(except the 7 RPM hits) was from repo data refreshes:
- 83 % is RHEL 5 repodata
- 13 % is RHEL 6 repodata
- remaining ~ 4 % of noise is Fedora repodata

It seems to me that we can get out the builder business completely and
decommission ipa-devel and replace it with COPR.

Do you agree? John? Nathaniel? Stephen? Anyone? :-)

-- 
Petr^2 Spacek

-- 
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code

Reply via email to