On 15.7.2015 09:44, Jan Pazdziora wrote: > On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 12:49:23PM -0400, John Dennis wrote: >> On 07/14/2015 12:03 PM, Petr Spacek wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> Is anyone using repos >>> https://jdennis.fedorapeople.org/ipa-devel/ >>> ? >>> >>> AFAIK nobody in Brno is seriously using it but I'm not sure about people >>> outside the Brno. >>> >>> Could we use COPR instead and get out of builder business? Upcoming lab >>> maintenance window could be a good time to do that. >> >> I would love to get out of the builder business and I suspect Nalin would as >> well [1]. The question came up in our Monday meeting as well. Nobody seem to >> know if anyone was using these builds and why we weren't using COPR. The > > The Fedora infra admins should be able to provide HTTP logs for the > repo, if you needs some numbers about potential usage.
That is a good idea! I got logs from Fedora admins and as far as I can tell, in the last month there were only 7 RPM downloads and nothing else. The 7 hits I found was for /ipa-devel/rhel/6/x86_64/os/sssd-1.13.1-0.20150813T1121Zgit137d5dd.el6.i686.rpm and other packages from the same version. I did not find any hits for IPA packages at all. All the remaining traffic (except the 7 RPM hits) was from repo data refreshes: - 83 % is RHEL 5 repodata - 13 % is RHEL 6 repodata - remaining ~ 4 % of noise is Fedora repodata It seems to me that we can get out the builder business completely and decommission ipa-devel and replace it with COPR. Do you agree? John? Nathaniel? Stephen? Anyone? :-) -- Petr^2 Spacek -- Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code