On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 09:28:38 -0500
Peter Doherty <dohe...@hkl.hms.harvard.edu> wrote:
> On Feb 2, 2011, at 09:09 , Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Tue, 1 Feb 2011 22:30:50 -0500
> > Peter Doherty <dohe...@hkl.hms.harvard.edu> wrote:
> >> On Feb 1, 2011, at 15:04 , Dmitri Pal wrote:
> >>> Also it is worth mentioning that we are planning to come up with
> >>> Beta 2 later this week so may be it makes sense to wait couple
> >>> days and move to the latest bits.
> >> Can I upgrade from Beta-1 to Beta-2, or are they incompatible?
> > There are small incompatibilities, some new schema and some changes
> > to the DIT.
> So you can't upgrade from 1.2 to 1.9 and you can't go from 1.9 to 2.0
> and you can't go from 2.0 beta-1 to 2.0 beta-2?
> So why would I want to use a product like that?
Upgrades will be possible within stable releases.
Handling upgrades in development versions would cost too much
development time w/o any real benefit as schema and DIT will be fixed
in stone once 2.0 final will be released.
Alpha and Beta release are not meant for production but only for
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York
Freeipa-users mailing list