On 07/12/2012 06:55 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Dmitri Pal <d...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 07/12/2012 06:19 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Stephen Ingram <sbing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Steven Jones <steven.jo...@vuw.ac.nz> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> I had huge memory issues pre 6.3, now its low and flat....Sounds like you 
>>>>> have an issue somewhere. My normal cpu use is a few hundred mhz....but 
>>>>> when "something" goes wrong such as replication failing that 
>>>>> climbs...ditto memory use....
>>>> Yes, I saw your conversation with Rich on this list about that. And,
>>>> yes, 6.2 (2.1.3) was bad for me too. I'm not sure why 2.2.0 is still
>>>> having issues. It was an upgrade from 2.1.3, but the upgrade seemed to
>>>> complete without issue. I'm also not even doing replication yet so I'm
>>>> not sure why memory is so high. Web interface is much slower too so
>>>> perhaps something else is wrong.
>>> Oops, I meant Rob, not Rich.
>> Do you use any things exposed via compat tree?
>> Do you have a lot of modifications that affect the data that is exposed
>> via this tree?
>> I suspect that the leak is somewhere there.
>> Try turning off the things that you do not use if there are any.
> I only query cn=users,cn=accounts,dc=example,dc=com and
> cn=groups,cn=accounts,dc=example,dc=com containers for mail info and
> use for Kerberos auth. There are only very infrequent mods to those
> trees previously mentioned via the Web UI. Almost all activity is
> reads, but lots of them for the mail servers (validating users, etc.).
> I plan to use replication and DNS, but not using now. From this, I
> don't think I'm using the compat tree. Would turning it off help
> anyway?
> Steve
It is worth a try. There is a known slow minor leak in the compat plugin.

Thank you,
Dmitri Pal

Sr. Engineering Manager IPA project,
Red Hat Inc.

Looking to carve out IT costs?

Freeipa-users mailing list

Reply via email to