Re: [FPM-Discuss] Re: GPL License Issues

[Tim Cook]

"Daniel L. Johnson, MD" wrote:
> 
> This is why the Mozilla Public License.  Have you rejected
> that, or a modification of it?

To be honest. I was in a position where I had rewritten FreePM
and it was time for the new release. I did not want to continue
with the GPL.  I had too many irons in the fire and chose the
easiest path. Based on BSD but without the annoying advertisement
clause. So in many ways it is similar to Zope, Python etc. But I
did not want to draw fire with a "FreePM Open Source License" so
I just called it a BSD-style (even though RMS hates that too).

Basically says that you can do what you want with the code. I'm
(nor are contributors) responsible for anything that happens
because you used it.  However you distribute it, binary or source
it must contain proper attributions to the authors and a link to
freepm.org

-- Tim Cook, President --
Free Practice Management,Inc. | http://FreePM.com
Office: (901) 884-4126
Censorship: The reaction of the ignorant to freedom.
_______________________________________________
Freepm-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freepm-discuss