I would like to express my concern too over the stability of FreeRDP. It was much better a year ago.
I'm concerned / confused about the future of FreeRDP. It seems like there is too many restructuring / refactoring of the source code that add no value. All the documentation on http://www.freerdp.com/api/ is out of date. Lack of help is the problem, but who wants to help? I hear a lot of complains about the windows'ish push. WinPR / window command line parameters / a registry on Linux. Talented Linux developers are discouraged by this. I'd have to say, I'm discouraged too. Another thing, with FreeRDP is such a bad state, why is this project forking my project xrdp? Why are you duplicating all the good work done on xrdp? And why call it xrdp-ng? Are you suggesting you can do a better RDP Linux server? I find it quite insulting! I think there are some tough management issues that need to be addressed. Jay ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60135991&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Freerdp-devel mailing list Freerdp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freerdp-devel
