On 03/11/2013 04:30 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
A right to monitor doesn't imply a right to understand, unless you
think you have an obligation to explain your jargon to any neophyte
who comes asking. :)
We are not obligated to explain it to each individual, but nor can we keep the definition of our jargon secret.
For many good reasons commercial usage of the amateur bands is prohibited
and that prohibition can not be effective, especially considering how
enforcement works, if communications are encrypted.
Thanks very much for this, I'll make sure to include it in my rationale. Self-regulation and community spectrum management don't work if _amateurs_ can't decode a communication.
The loss of relevance of the amateur service comes in part from a mismatch
between how people use communications technology today —as an
increasingly personal and intimate part of their lives— and the rules
and norms of amateur radio.
We can't continue to justify the Amateur service mainly through its potential for emergency communications, simply because it is becoming technologically easier for our served organizations to take care of themselves. At least if they put the money and time into that task. Then again, I'm not holding my breath waiting for them /all/ to acquire this degree of competence.

IMO our long term justifications are innovation and education, not emergency communications.
for SHF+ the ham spectrum is
almost universally underutilized and between wide spectrum and spacial
reuse (due to the possibility of highly directional P2P signals) there
is technically a lot of potential to do things like have communities
further the public interest by building backbone infrastructure for
third party access to the Internet, coordinated by and in the spirit
of amateur communications
That's constructing an application to justify keeping frequencies that we would not otherwise need. I think that you need authentic Amateur use to justify keeping the spectrum. Third-party access would be better done in Part 15 or Part 90 than in the Amateur service.

    Thanks

    Bruce

<<attachment: bruce.vcf>>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The Forrester  
Wave(TM): Endpoint Security, Q1 2013 and "remains a good choice" in the  
endpoint security space. For insight on selecting the right partner to 
tackle endpoint security challenges, access the full report. 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/symantec-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Freetel-codec2 mailing list
Freetel-codec2@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2

Reply via email to