Tory --

It was mostly that the stages seem to be empirically valid - I can recall many 
instances where I've been in a team or relationship that had the excitement and 
novelty of coming together, the inevitable misunderstandings/arguments about 
how to proceed, a reconciliation and synthesis of the preferred approach, and 
finally, working together along those preferred lines to achieve something. The 
hazard is that it's presented in such a way as to suggest that there's an 
orderly, linear progression, whereas we know it's often quite the contrary. I 
tend to see it (and, relating it to my thinking) as a continuum - the 
progression is a road map, perhaps, but I'm likely to be taking on ramps and 
off ramps along the way. It's not at all clear, either in my own mind or when 
I'm working with others, where the transitions occur: no bright line between 
"storming" and "norming", for example.

- Claiborne -

 


 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Victoria Hughes <[email protected]>
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[email protected]>
Sent: Fri, Jul 9, 2010 11:00 pm
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Projects:  5 Stages


Dunno. Not familiar with that. One aim of mine with this book is to phrase 
these ideas in a way that the beloved General Public can use them. Not just 
B-school types. I want the basic concept to be generally accessible. Needs to 
be, after all.


Will look into this. 
Has it affected how you conceptualize and take action on ideas and goals?
Or was it interesting (partly because of the alliteration, that memorable 
lilting he set up sticks in our brains like the Oscar Mayer Weiner song)
Happy to hear speculations, no worries.


Tory


On Jul 9, 2010, at 6:40 PM, [email protected] wrote:


Tory --
 
 How does this relate (if at all) to the simplistic group dynamics model I 
learned in business school (attributed to Bruce Tuckman)?
 
 forming
 storming
 norming
 performing
  
 
 
 
 At a minimum, I'm missing a stage, and I'm sure there's much more to your 
analysis. Excuse my speculations.
 
 - Claiborne Booker -
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
-----Original Message-----
 From: Victoria Hughes <[email protected]>
 To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[email protected]>
 Sent: Fri, Jul 9, 2010 8:14 pm
 Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Projects:  5 Stages
 
 
 Yup, in most cases. Sometimes limitations force unusual, possibly more 
successful, resolutions. I don't know the book, will look into it. Thanks. 

 
 
Tory
 

 
 
 
On Jul 9, 2010, at 5:51 PM, Stephen Thompson wrote:
 

 
 Tory:  
  
  I am part way through Scott Page's book titled The Difference  He discussed 
the the power of diversity to 
  produce better groups and outcomes.  Are you aware of that reference?  None, 
some, or much diversity 
  would influence the stages or at least successful completion of the stages 
would it not? 
  
  Steph T  
  
  
  
  
  Victoria Hughes wrote: 
Fascinating. The original story and its appearance/discussion here.  

   
 I am writing a book on the five simple stages that projects move through, from 
idea to reality. 
   
 Part of the chapter, whose midst I am in, discusses "teams", inner and outer:  
the grouping  of abilities and attributes required to get unstuck and get 
something done. 
   
 Sometimes the 'crate o' chickens' is outside of us,  if we are working with a 
team.  Sometimes our team is made from aspects of our own mind: the internal - 
complex- interconnection of knowledge, abilities, ideas, etc all squawking, 
laying, attacking, defending, at once, inside our brains.
   

   
   
 Glad to know that even among the inheritors of the reptilian hind brain there 
can be cooperation for a larger good, even if that is for more chickens. 
   

   
   
 Tory
   

   
   
  
  
On Jul 9, 2010, at 4:53 PM, Ted Carmichael wrote:
   
  
Well, it wouldn't ... unless you were selecting for the lowest producing hens.  
  

     
     
The GA selects for the groups of chickens that produce the most eggs, not the 
individuals.  Some of those individuals may actually not produce many eggs, but 
they must somehow help the ones that do produce more eggs (in their group).
     

     
     
-t
     
     
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Shawn Barr    <[email protected]> wrote:
     
 Ted,
       
  I'm confused.  Why would a genetic algorithm ever select a hen that produces 
fewer eggs over a hen that produces more eggs?
       
       
  Shawn      
      

       
       
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Ted Carmichael <[email protected]> wrote:
       
Nick, this is perfect.  Thank you!        

         
         
BTW - the reason for this request is, my advisor and I were asked to write a 
chapter on Complex Adaptive Systems, for a cognitive science textbook.  In it, 
I talk briefly about GA, and put this story about the chickens in because I 
thought it was a neat example.
         

         
         
I'll add the references now.  Much appreciated.
         

         
         
-t
         
                 
        
        
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Nicholas Thompson <[email protected]> 
wrote:
         
         
         
          
          
          
          
          
Ted, 
           
 
           
Ok.  So, if I am correct,  this was an actual EXPERIMENT done by two 
researchers at Indiana University, I think.  As  I "tell" the "story", it was 
the practice to use individual selection to identify the most productive 
chickens, but the egg production method involved crates of nine chickens.  The 
individual selection method inadvertently selected for the most aggressive 
chickens, so that once you threw them together in crates of nine, it would be 
like asking nine prom queens to work together in a tug of war.  The chickens 
had to be debeaked or they would kill each other.  So, the researchers started 
selection for the best producing CRATES of chickens.  Aggression went down, 
mortality went down, crate production went up, and debeaking became 
unnecessary.  
           
 
           
The experiment is described in Sober and Wilson's UNTO OTHERS or Wilson's 
EVOLUTION FOR EVERYBODY,  which are  safely tucked away in my book case 2000 
miles away in Santa Fe.   Fortunately, it is also described in 
           
 
           
Dave Wilson's blog  
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-sloan-wilson/truth-and-reconciliation_b_266316.html
           
 
           
Here is the original reference: 
           
 
           
GROUP SELECTION FOR ADAPTATION TO MULTIPLE-HEN CAGES : SELECTION PROGRAM AND 
DIRECT RESPONSES 
           
Auteur(s) / Author(s)
          
MUIR W. M. ; 
           
Revue / Journal Title
          
Poultry science    ISSN  0032-5791   CODEN POSCAL  
           
Source / Source
          
1996, vol. 75, no4, pp. 447-458 [12 page(s) (article)]
           
 
           
If you Google "group selection in chickens," you will find lots of other 
interesting stuff. 
           
 
           
 
           
Let me know if this helps and what you think.  
           
 
           
N
           
 
           
Nicholas S. Thompson
           
          
Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Ethology, 
           
Clark University ([email protected])
           
http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/
           
http://www.cusf.org [City University of Santa Fe]
           
 
           
 
           
 
           
           
           
 
           
            
            
----- Original Message ----- 
             
            From: Ted Carmichael 
             
             
            
To:            The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
             
             
            
Sent: 7/9/2010 5:34:29 AM 
             
Subject: [FRIAM] Real-world genetic algorithm example... help!
             

             
             Dear all,            

             
             
I'm trying to find reference to a story I read some time ago (a few years, 
perhaps?), and I'm hoping that either: a) I heard it from someone on this list, 
or b) someone on this list heard it, too.
             

             
             
Anyway, it was a really cool example of a real-world genetic algorithm, having 
to do with chickens.  Traditionally, the best egg-producing chickens were 
allowed to produce the offspring for future generations.  However, these new 
chickens rarely lived up to their potential.  It was thought that maybe there 
were unknown things going on in the clusters of chickens, which represent the 
actual environment that these chickens are kept in.  And that the high 
producers, when gathered together in these groups, somehow failed to produce as 
many eggs as expected.
             

             
             
So researchers decided to apply the fitness function to groups of chickens, 
rather than individuals.  This would perhaps account for social traits that are 
generally unknown, but may affect how many eggs were laid.  In fact, the 
researchers didn't care what those traits are, only that - whatever they may be 
- they are preserved in future generations in a way that increased production.
             

             
             
And the experiment worked.  Groups of chickens that produced the most eggs were 
preserved, and subsequent generations were much more productive than with the 
traditional methods.
             

             
             
Anyway, that's the story.  If anyone can provide a link, I would be very 
grateful.  (As I recall, it wasn't a technical paper, but rather a story in a 
more accessible venue.  Perhaps the NY Times article, or something similar?)
             

             
             
Thanks!
             

             
             
-Ted
             
           
          
           
           
           
           
============================================================
  FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
  Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
  lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
           
         
        
         
         
         
  ============================================================
  FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
  Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
  lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
       
      
       
       
       
       
  ============================================================
  FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
  Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
  lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
     
    
     
     
  ============================================================
  FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
  Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
  lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
  
   
   
   
-----------------------------------  

  TORY HUGHES  
[email protected]
   
Tory Hughes website
   
Facebook|Tory Hughes Art
   
------------------------------------
   
   
    
   
   
   
   







============================================================





FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv





Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College





lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
 
 
   ============================================================
 FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
 Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
 lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
 
 
  
----------------------------------- 

TORY HUGHES 
[email protected]
 
Tory Hughes website
 
Facebook|Tory Hughes Art
 
------------------------------------
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 = 
   
 
============================================================





FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv





Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College





lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org






 
   
  ============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org


 
-----------------------------------

TORY HUGHES
[email protected]
Tory Hughes website
Facebook|Tory Hughes Art
------------------------------------

 


=
 
============================================================

FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv

Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College

lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org


 
=
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Reply via email to