Heh, as long as you identify the particulars of the use case, then "both-and" is intuitive and correct. But when someone makes an ambiguous statement with no particulars and makes no serious attempt to describe the context in which their statement is supposed to be understood, then it's definitely NOT "both-and". Without the particulars, it becomes nonsense and one can only answer "Mu".
On 11/02/2017 11:47 AM, Frank Wimberly wrote: > Another thing that helps me with Friam disagreements is to think in terms of > "both-and" rather than "either-or". In Fiddler on the Roof, Tevya says to A, > "you're right". B objects and Tevya says again, "You're right". C says that > they can't both be right and Tevya says, "You're also right". -- ☣ gⅼеɳ ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
