Glen, because I like control-loop metaphors for behavior, and think we are very close on that issue, the more interesting question, to me, is: "Why would we claim what Peirce claims in "What is Pragmatism?", that there must be some things without a control loop at all?"
The answer is, I think, that is what science finds. What of phrenology, or the attempt to measure ether winds, or bodily humours, or to determine the make up of all the substances of the world out of the basic elements of fire, earth, water, and air, or countless other aborted scientific endeavors that serious people worked towards for decades? They found that if you tried to cleave the world by those joints, and determine the relations between the parts, you never got to a consensus about what the heck was going on. The data didn't converge. New categories seemed more promising, and the old categories were abandoned. Many of those new categories were themselves abandoned after additional decades of work by the community. Other new categories have been remarkably stable in their ability to lead us to successful prediction and control. Those remarkably successful categories might themselves be overturned one day - as we find the limits of the success of their implications-in-practice. Even in many of those cases where our knowledge seems most stable, it seems so largely due to our having slowly limited the scope of the claims - X is true under such and such conditions ( X and Y form compound X2Y3, when the PH of the suspension is at least 7, the temperature above 87 degrees, the pressure under 2 atmospheres, etc.). How many asserted "laws" of physics throughout history are still believed to be true EVERYWHERE in the universe, and to have been that way at ALL times? Even inside black holes, or in the first moments after the big bang? Or, to more directly answer your question: There are things we can conceive of that do not, in fact, have a control loop at all, because our conceptions are shitty. It may even be that very little we encounter and think we have gotten a mental handle on has anything beyond local stability. That includes both geographical and temporal locality, i.e., happenstance. That, at least, is what I think Peirce is asserting in that context. ----------- Eric P. Charles, Ph.D. Supervisory Survey Statistician U.S. Marine Corps <[email protected]>
============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
