By my internal model of Nick, I would guess that he is referring to Peirce. Though it is funny to imagine that logic has done nothing of consequence since 1914, that no other thinkers have come along and moved the subject forward, and that logicians still simply practice the subject from within some century-old framework. Perhaps I am wrong and he would cite Lawvere, Eilenberg, Kripke, Girard, Curry, Church, Per Martin-Löf, or ...
-- Sent from: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
