- instead of sayTeX$Lisp, sayTexmacs$Lisp, etc we should have
sayOutput. At the beginning we should have macro expanding
to correct value, like:
sayOutput ==> sayTexmacs$Lisp
or
sayOutput ==> sayTex$Lisp
That way we preserve similarity and avoid spreading $Lisp all
over the source.
Actually, I'd rather have sayOutput in a package Foo which takes a
parameter "TeX", "TeXmacs", etc. (whether string or an integer that is
used for selection, I don't care much), but then one would have
say x ==> sayOutput("TeXmacs", x)$Foo
then all the Lisp stuff would be concentrated in Foo.
Ralf
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS -
computer algebra system" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel?hl=en.
