Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
>
> > - instead of sayTeX$Lisp, sayTexmacs$Lisp, etc we should have
> > sayOutput. At the beginning we should have macro expanding
> > to correct value, like:
> >
> > sayOutput ==> sayTexmacs$Lisp
> >
> > or
> >
> > sayOutput ==> sayTex$Lisp
> >
> > That way we preserve similarity and avoid spreading $Lisp all
> > over the source.
>
> Actually, I'd rather have sayOutput in a package Foo which takes a
> parameter "TeX", "TeXmacs", etc. (whether string or an integer that is
> used for selection, I don't care much), but then one would have
>
> say x ==> sayOutput("TeXmacs", x)$Foo
>
> then all the Lisp stuff would be concentrated in Foo.
>
Why do you want to introduce parameter? It looks like completly
unnecessary indirection.
--
Waldek Hebisch
[email protected]
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"FriCAS - computer algebra system" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel?hl=en.
