On 21.03.21 17:49, Waldek Hebisch wrote: > There is misunderstanding here: you do not need to wait > to include another graphic framework. My impression > was that I am not the main opponent of new code in > FriCAS: when new code was proposed sometimes other > folks voiced strong objections...
Oh, good that you say that so openly. You are very conservative and with strong opinion about the direction of FriCAS. I guess, we have lost Robert Smith for contribution to FriCAS. I don't generally say that this conservativeness is a bad thing. Sometimes I even appreciate it after a while (even against my own opinion and wishes). However, it gives the impression that contributions are easily turned down and investing time in new code seems like a waste. As you say above that impression is wrong, but still it sometimes sounds unwelcome to new people. This is what I consider a problem for further and faster development of FriCAS. We should rather say that it is OK to just fork FriCAS and try own ideas and come back and convince the main developers to include new (better) code if it is ready and removes some deficiencies of FriCAS. Ralf -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fricas-devel/80a83ec9-b580-7e22-9994-f8e2cfe9508f%40hemmecke.org.
