A part que c'est marqué dessus (comme le Port Salut) "supports only EVM 
modules" et que il y a 2 mm de métal à enlever au Dremel, est-ce que quelqu'un 
a une objection à mettre un NM-1FE-TX dans le slot 2 d'un Cisco 2851 ?
Oui je sais, "c'est pas une configuration supportée par Cisco". Mais.....

c2851#sh ip inte brie
Interface                  IP-Address      OK? Method Status                
Protocol
GigabitEthernet0/0         unassigned      YES manual up                    down
GigabitEthernet0/1         unassigned      YES NVRAM  up                    down
FastEthernet1/0            unassigned      YES NVRAM  up                    down
FastEthernet2/0            192.168.xxx.xx  YES DHCP   up                    up

Cisco 2851 (revision 1.0) with 1034240K/14336K bytes of memory.
2 FastEthernet interfaces
2 Gigabit Ethernet interfaces
1 Virtual Private Network (VPN) Module

c2851#sh inte f2/0
FastEthernet2/0 is up, line protocol is up
  Hardware is AmdFE, address is 001a.a19f.2ce8 (bia 001a.a19f.2ce8)
  Internet address is 192.168.222.53/24
  MTU 1500 bytes, BW 100000 Kbit/sec, DLY 100 usec,
     reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
  Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
  Keepalive set (10 sec)
  Full-duplex, 100Mb/s, 100BaseTX/FX
  ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00
  Last input 00:00:00, output 00:00:00, output hang never
  Last clearing of "show interface" counters never
  Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0
  Queueing strategy: fifo
  Output queue: 0/40 (size/max)
  5 minute input rate 1000 bits/sec, 1 packets/sec
  5 minute output rate 1000 bits/sec, 1 packets/sec
     457 packets input, 50159 bytes
     Received 294 broadcasts (0 IP multicasts)
     0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
     0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored
     0 watchdog
     0 input packets with dribble condition detected
     403 packets output, 39841 bytes, 0 underruns
     0 output errors, 0 collisions, 1 interface resets
     0 unknown protocol drops
     0 babbles, 0 late collision, 0 deferred
     0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier
     0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out



> David Ponzone a écrit :
> Et sinon, quelqu’un a déjà imaginé faire un boitier en impression 3D ?

Ah puisqu'on est trolldi :
Pour un boitier de Raspberry Pi, oui. Pour un boitier métal à monter dans un 
rack 19", non.
https://i.materialise.com/blog/take-a-look-at-this-beautiful-3d-printed-raspberry-pi-case-design-from-cody-reisdorf


---------------------------
Liste de diffusion du FRnOG
http://www.frnog.org/

Répondre à