If you can't drop your shorts and flap in the wind at the airport (unless you're lucky enough to be selected for supplemental screening), why is it all the sudden okay to display it on a 15" LCD?
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 1:41 PM, Richard M. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8V7E2E04&show_article=1 > > > > DENVER (AP) - Travelers using Denver International Airport's free Wi-Fi > service cannot visit Internet > sites<http://search.breitbart.com/q?s=%22Internet+sites%22&sid=breitbart.com>that > airport officials consider provocative. > > A report in The Denver > Post<http://search.breitbart.com/q?s=%22Denver+Post%22&sid=breitbart.com>says > the airport is blocking Vanity Fair magazine's Web site, the hipster > site boingboing.net and others. > > Airport spokesman Chuck Cannon says officials decided to block access to > potentially racy sites when the airport made its wireless internet service > free in November. > > Cannon says the airport would rather deal with infrequent complaints about > access than handle angry parents whose children might see pornography. > > Critics say the airport is using the same technology used by repressive > regimes in Sudan and Kuwait. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. > https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec > Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list. >
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
