> The free service is provided by the Airport (be it government or > private, doesn't matter). If you wish to use it, you abide by the > rules and restrictions that they put in place for [its] use. In this > case, it's no porn.
Actually, no, it's "nothing our censorware considers dodgy", which is a whole lot broader brush than "no porn" (poster child, boingboing). > I'm also a BIG fan of arresting anyone that is viewing porn in a > public area where anyone can walk by and see material that is > objectionable to them. Whose idea of "objectionable" controls, though? I certainly know there are a whole lot of things _I_ find more objectionable than overt sex (which is what most uses of "porn" really mean). Start down the "`protect' the public from `objectionable' material" road and you will rapidly either take down the wifi entirely or wind up turning it into "`protect' the public from anything our censor doesn't like". (The latter, of course, is exactly where we started, with a particular automated value of "our censor".) /~\ The ASCII der Mouse \ / Ribbon Campaign X Against HTML [EMAIL PROTECTED] / \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
