Since when did the requirement of 100% success become the bar that must be crossed for any policy? If you really believed 100% effectiveness was required before anything was initiated, we'd have to give up on information security all together.
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 11:49 AM, Rich Kulawiec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 10:18:41AM -0500, John C. A. Bambenek, GCIH, CISSP > wrote: > > Cannon says the airport would rather deal with infrequent complaints > about > > access than handle angry parents whose children might see pornography. > > Because, of course, this will prevent anyone sitting in the terminal from > watching full-length, hi-def porn using the DVD player in their laptop. > > "We must do it for the childrennnnnnnn" is rapidly gaining equal > status with "We take this problem seriously" as an utterly trustworthy > guarantee that whatever follows will be completely fabricated bullshit. > > ---Rsk > _______________________________________________ > Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. > https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec > Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list. >
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
