On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 10:18:41AM -0500, John C. A. Bambenek, GCIH, CISSP wrote: > Cannon says the airport would rather deal with infrequent complaints about > access than handle angry parents whose children might see pornography.
Because, of course, this will prevent anyone sitting in the terminal from watching full-length, hi-def porn using the DVD player in their laptop. "We must do it for the childrennnnnnnn" is rapidly gaining equal status with "We take this problem seriously" as an utterly trustworthy guarantee that whatever follows will be completely fabricated bullshit. ---Rsk _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
