We must protect the childern!
If we can have everyone who wants porn subscribe to the "don't censor me" 
program to admit they watch it, all the better! [Israel law passed to 
protect children]
Cisco and the religious elements pushed it.

Up until now, Israel had ZERO censorship.


On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Drsolly wrote:

> I'm not an American, so I'm constantly amazed at an attitude that says
> "Censorship? We don't do that in freedom-loving America", while at the
> same time having the most stringent censorship system outside the world of
> Islam, done mostly in the names of "God", "Jesus" and "the children".
>
> We're still chuckling over the furore caused by (I forget her name, was it
> Jackson?) who showed a nipple at some sporting event, shock, horror, "what
> about the children", thus causing millions of children all over America to
> go into terminal meltdown or at least be scarred for life by this
> appalling sight.
>
> It's even funnier than listening to your president try to talk.
>
>
>
> On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, John C. A. Bambenek, GCIH, CISSP wrote:
>
>> Since when did the requirement of 100% success become the bar that must be
>> crossed for any policy?  If you really believed 100% effectiveness was
>> required before anything was initiated, we'd have to give up on information
>> security all together.
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 11:49 AM, Rich Kulawiec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 10:18:41AM -0500, John C. A. Bambenek, GCIH, CISSP
>>> wrote:
>>>> Cannon says the airport would rather deal with infrequent complaints
>>> about
>>>> access than handle angry parents whose children might see pornography.
>>>
>>> Because, of course, this will prevent anyone sitting in the terminal from
>>> watching full-length, hi-def porn using the DVD player in their laptop.
>>>
>>> "We must do it for the childrennnnnnnn" is rapidly gaining equal
>>> status with "We take this problem seriously" as an utterly trustworthy
>>> guarantee that whatever follows will be completely fabricated bullshit.
>>>
>>> ---Rsk
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
>>> https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
>>> Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
> https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
> Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
>
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.

Reply via email to