XFB moves the responsibility of circuit navigation to the root of a home
application. XFB further allows circuits to control their own destiny if
they are stand alone or nested based on whether or not the home application
sees that the circuit exists in its world.
I have too more sentences but did not want to incite the inquisition.
Mike Craig
-----Original Message-----
From: Todd Ashworth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 1:02 PM
To: Fusebox
Subject: Re: Musings on Attributes (was Best Practices...)
I kind of agree with Stan too. It seems like there is too much complexity
involved for something as simple as nesting circuits ... then again, that
makes me think I'm not understanding what XFB is all about. Can anyone sum
it up in 1 or 2 sentances?
Todd Ashworth --
----- Original Message -----
From: "McCollough, Alan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Fusebox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 12:18 PM
Subject: RE: Musings on Attributes (was Best Practices...)
| Ahhh Stan. Welcome back, buddy! I'll side with Stan, I'm just not 'getting
| it' on the whole XFB thing. Maybe I'll stick to the old version of
Fusebox,
| but I'll just add in some BLINK tags for show...
|
| > -----Original Message-----
| > From: Stan Cox [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
| > Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 11:14 PM
| > To: Fusebox
| > Subject: RE: Musings on Attributes (was Best Practices...)
| >
| > <html><DIV>I read the lots of emials but then I cant read them for the
| > things that you guyz are saying when you typed it. I still am
using
| > the Cold Fuzian and my boss say to use fuz box or else i am not
going
| > to be do work at my rockin' job so I try to lern as hard as I can
try
| > but it is hard to lern it. I try to read all these emalis but then
i
| > do not get it when you say XBF and stuff like that. before it was
no
| > XBF but then now it is lots of these messajes. i dont want to be
an
| > meenie but i am getting upset about the lots of emails to here that
i
| > do not be figureing out. Geocities is simple and I am very very
very
| > good programmer for it. Cold Fuzian is simple but harder at it but
i
| > can do cool things in it like put hello #name# in the tables.
| > Fusebox is simple because i don't have lots of rules to
| > follow. I hope fusebox stays simple because if it is not
| > simple i will not be able to be using it for my rockin programming
| > skillz. </DIV>
| > <DIV> </DIV>
| > <DIV>FreeI is the rocking horse that rocks the free programing interntet
| > programming!</DIV>
| > <DIV> </DIV>
| > <DIV> </DIV><br clear=all><hr>Get your FREE download of MSN
Explorer
| > at <a
| >
href="http://explorer.msn.com">http://explorer.msn.com</a><br></p></html>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
