Well, we have a lot of enterprising souls here -- You guys created Fusebox
together. Why don't we plan this out and do some real testing? Michael has
done a lot of ColdFusion R&D and he knows about testing the performance of
different types of code. I know Steve is good with testing for bugs and I'm
sure you've all tested apps. If we plan this out right, I don't see why we
can't do something that will show Fusebox vs. non-Fusebox apps and test them
out well.
And I've heard people complain that the Fusebox architecture is too bloated,
that it runs too slow. Well -- doesn't it make sense to initiate some
testing to (hopefully) disprove that?
Judith
----- Original Message -----
From: Hal Helms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Fusebox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 1:29 PM
Subject: RE: Test of Fusebox vs. Non-Fusebox applications: Have there been
any?
> ***************************** Team Allaire *****************************
> I think this would be a GREAT idea, Judith. I wish some enterprising soul
> would take on themself the task of doing metrics of all sorts; it would
> really inform out decisions about things.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
