I currently have a forum running on CF 4.5.1 SP2 sitting on top of MS SQL2k
that is non-fusebox but I have planned to make the conversion in the coming
2 weeks. It's got everything...forms, database intensive etc..
http://www.merc-hq.com
Feel free to register (otheriwse you can not post). Its a forum for a gaming
commmunity. About 2000 hits per day or so...Decent traffic.
If yall can give me a guideline on what benchmarks will be used in the
sutdy, I'd gladly contribute.
I have a second site which is VERY DB intensive with CF 4.5.1 SP2 sitting on
top of Oracle 8i DB. We're talking millions of records on the DB side. It's
hosted on NT/IIS in development and Solaris/Apache in production. It's a
reporting tool. Also incorporates some Java for one-way encryption on user
password. Also wanted to convert/expand into fusebox over the next 4 weeks.
This site is internal so I can't show you! :(
Stace
-----Original Message-----
From: Erika L. Walker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 8:45 AM
To: Fusebox
Subject: RE: Test of Fusebox vs. Non-Fusebox applications: Have there been
any?
Well, what kind of app do we want to test? Shall we take a non-Fusebox app
and covert it to Fusebox or the other way around.....which kind of app is
going to best represent a variety of functionality that makes testing it
worthwhile? Something database intensive? Generations of forms? What do you
think?
I'd certainly be willing to do the non-Fusebox version and spend some time
on this, for curiosity's sake and the documentation.
Erika
(with a *K*)
"Don't hurry, don't worry. You're only here for a short visit. So be sure to
stop and smell the flowers." - Walter C. Hagen
-----------------------------------------------------
-----Original Message-----
From: Hal Helms [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 11:55 PM
To: Fusebox
Subject: RE: Test of Fusebox vs. Non-Fusebox applications: Have there been
any?
***************************** Team Allaire ***************************** I'm
all for it. Who's gonna head this up?
-----Original Message-----
From: Judith Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 11:30 PM
To: Fusebox
Subject: Re: Test of Fusebox vs. Non-Fusebox applications: Have there been
any?
Well, we have a lot of enterprising souls here -- You guys created Fusebox
together. Why don't we plan this out and do some real testing? Michael has
done a lot of ColdFusion R&D and he knows about testing the performance of
different types of code. I know Steve is good with testing for bugs and I'm
sure you've all tested apps. If we plan this out right, I don't see why we
can't do something that will show Fusebox vs. non-Fusebox apps and test them
out well.
And I've heard people complain that the Fusebox architecture is too bloated,
that it runs too slow. Well -- doesn't it make sense to initiate some
testing to (hopefully) disprove that?
Judith
----- Original Message -----
From: Hal Helms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Fusebox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 1:29 PM
Subject: RE: Test of Fusebox vs. Non-Fusebox applications: Have there been
any?
> ***************************** Team Allaire
> ***************************** I think this would be a GREAT idea,
> Judith. I wish some enterprising soul would take on themself the task
> of doing metrics of all sorts; it would really inform out decisions
> about things.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
