Give me any Fusebox site and I'll rewrite it in non-Fusebox and
my version will perform better every time. What exactly are you
trying to prove? If the people on CF-Community want to know the
real value of Fusebox, just tell them to talk to some people
who have done it both ways. (Maybe we can start a page on
FuseWiki for FuseBoxSuccessStories so we have something to point
to every time this comes up.)
I also think the CF vs. PHP benchmarking tests are a waste of
time. If you want to do some benchmarking, get a couple of
J2EE implementations and benchmark apples to apples. Neither
claims performance as one of its primary advantages anyway.
PHP vs. CF always boils down to open-source vs.
non-open-source, so why not just cut to the chase? (BTW,
who wants to bet there will be no CF 7.0? I say Macromedia
will make it open-source by then.)
Patrick
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Judith Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 12:55 PM
> To: Fusebox
> Subject: Test of Fusebox vs. Non-Fusebox applications: Have there been
> any?
>
>
> Guys:
>
> Have any of you ever coded a Fusebox vs. a non-Fusebox app to see
> which one
> performs better? Just wondering (No, don't throw those stale
> muffins at me!
> Really, I think Fusebox is great ...)
>
> You see, there's been an ongoing thread (on PHP vs. CF) on the
> CF-Community
> list, and we were discussing doing benchmarking tests of CF vs.
> PHP. So the
> question arose about Fusebox vs. non-Fusebox. I was wondering if
> any testing
> had been done.
>
> Judith
>
>
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
