I agree with you on most points. I'm not converting to Fusebox for speed
increase. More portability and make my site more manageable so I can
concentrate on adding cool features.
PHP vs CF issue is retarded. I think a talented programmer on either side
can accomplish relatively the same result...although I'd recommend CF over
PHP for corporate environment ANYDAY for scalability concerns and cost in
development.
CF 7.0? Hmm tough call...I believe by that time JSP tags will look A LOT
like CF TAGS. ;-)
but CF developers have to be "eased" into it...
-----Original Message-----
From: Patrick McElhaney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 9:34 AM
To: Fusebox
Subject: RE: Test of Fusebox vs. Non-Fusebox applications: Have there been
any?
Give me any Fusebox site and I'll rewrite it in non-Fusebox and
my version will perform better every time. What exactly are you trying to
prove? If the people on CF-Community want to know the real value of Fusebox,
just tell them to talk to some people
who have done it both ways. (Maybe we can start a page on FuseWiki for
FuseBoxSuccessStories so we have something to point to every time this comes
up.)
I also think the CF vs. PHP benchmarking tests are a waste of
time. If you want to do some benchmarking, get a couple of
J2EE implementations and benchmark apples to apples. Neither
claims performance as one of its primary advantages anyway.
PHP vs. CF always boils down to open-source vs.
non-open-source, so why not just cut to the chase? (BTW,
who wants to bet there will be no CF 7.0? I say Macromedia
will make it open-source by then.)
Patrick
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Judith Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 12:55 PM
> To: Fusebox
> Subject: Test of Fusebox vs. Non-Fusebox applications: Have there been
> any?
>
>
> Guys:
>
> Have any of you ever coded a Fusebox vs. a non-Fusebox app to see
> which one
> performs better? Just wondering (No, don't throw those stale
> muffins at me!
> Really, I think Fusebox is great ...)
>
> You see, there's been an ongoing thread (on PHP vs. CF) on the
> CF-Community
> list, and we were discussing doing benchmarking tests of CF vs.
> PHP. So the
> question arose about Fusebox vs. non-Fusebox. I was wondering if
> any testing
> had been done.
>
> Judith
>
>
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
