John, Fusedocs was always designed with the idea that once XML parsers became more prevalent, we could drop the comments tags. Thus on MX, we have:
<cfxml variable="dsp_ThisFuse.cfm"> <fusedoc...> </fusedoc> </cfxml> That's perfectly valid XML. -----Original Message----- From: John Farrar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 8:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: fusedoc type="" Slightly off focus... With web services we have wsdl's... separate files... shouldn't we do the same type of thing with fuse descriptions? Fusedocs is nice but not very accessable. It has been out for two years and it is burried inside of a file in a way that fundamemtally is not 'Valid XML'. I was thinking of working up a fdl (fuse description language) that followed the basics of fusedoc... but was separate. It even seems possible that each circuit could have the fusedocs nested together. This would work for all fuses in the root directory, nested fuse group directories (queries, action, display, etc.), and even MVC. Just a question... but I would like to see something more readily accessable and something we could write directly to with ColdFusion MX tools. John ==^================================================================ This email was sent to: [email protected] EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrFMa.bV0Kx9 Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================
