M.Gurstein wrote: > Whether those people have significantly developed/underdeveloped frontal > paraphernalia (Keith) or are fairies with fangs from the bottom of the > garden (Chris) doesn't make much difference at all to the process or its > outcomes.
The usual misrepresentation of my statements. Strawmen are not arguments. Predators aren't fairies. But whether people believe in Predators (giving them power), makes one helluva difference to the process and outcomes. No matter whether they are Hindus or Christians. As for the microcredit system, the big lenders crushed it for the same reason that Walmart crushed Mom&Pop: Desperate people have little choice, and Predators create the coercive conditions for their decisions. --- REH wrote: > You have to get closer to the people Keith. The Western guy comes in and > breaks up the traditions and when his traditions turn out to be out of sync > with the system of the culture and effects people's lives there are > repercussions. Why do you only blame "the Western guy" (priest), although the "Eastern guy" (monk) would ALSO fail to fix the emergency? You rejected the "competitive advantage" concept as European, but you apply it yourself in the example of the missionary (suggesting that the Hindu religion was better), and earlier with your boast of "the world's best genius crop" (which it isn't). --- > Wasn't it a Swiss theologian who > said you were pre-programmed to think like that as a result of being > pre-destined? You just can't help yourself. The universe did it to you. The inacceptable racist slander continues. Arthur sent a wrong message by encouraging Ray. Btw, Calvin was French. And in case you still missed it, I'm an atheist. So what's your point? I suggest you first get over your esoterical beliefs, before trying to lecture an atheist that one religion is wrong. Chris _______________________________________________ Futurework mailing list [email protected] https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
