Lawry wrote:
> The assumption that the reference was to Jean Calvin did seem off.

Oh, I'm soo sorry that I forgot which religious predator exactly said what.
So REH meant Barth.  As if that would make the broad sweep okay...

> Calvin was a nasty piece of work who found a welcome in Geneva and
> dominated the place for quite a while. Among his nasty behavior was
> the pursuit of Michael Servetus, a Spanish Reformer of considerable
> humanity and brilliance who refuted the notion of the Trinity.
> Fearing rivalry more than theology, Calvin engineered Servetus
> execution in geneva, where he had sought refuge.
>
> Leading members of the Genevese elite served as Servetus's prosecuter
> and judge (Berthelier and Tissot), families that even today are dominant
> in Geneva.

Oh yeah, Geneva is SUCH an evil place... it even hosts the ICRC and the
U.N. headquarters for Europe...  Besides, in Calvin's lifetime, Geneva
wasn't even part of Switzerland (only over 2 centuries later).  But I
guess such "details" overtax the broad sweep's ability to differentiate.

Perhaps you guys should be more concerned about all the "nasty pieces of
work" who found a welcome in America and dominated the place (and not only
that place!) for quite a while, or even to this day.  They definitely
make a bigger difference for our world than Barth and Calvin combined.
But then, REH has to watch his reputation in NYC, so he better shoot
somewhere else.

Chris




~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
SpamWall: Mail to this addy is deleted unread unless it contains the keyword
"igve".


_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to