Russia is a prime example of what can happen following a revolution.  The good 
feelings about what had happened in 1917 lasted for a year or two when there 
was still a great deal of hope and charisma about the good that could come of 
building the communist state.  Factories had to be built, and dams, roads and 
railroads to the far corners of the country.  What resulted from this was a 
huge amount of forced labour and shipping off large parts of the population to 
the notorious gulags. The Soviet Union, which spent a couple of decades dying 
in the 1970' and 80's, breathed its last gasp in 1991, and a 1%/99% form of 
capitalism took over.  Many saw it as a new revolution: out with the 
authoritarian state; in with freedom.  But it didn't work that way.  When I was 
there in 1995, the oligarchs looked after themselves at the top and "mafias" 
looked after themselves at the bottom.  Everyone between lived in a state of 
poverty and chaos.  What Russia demonstrated both in 1917 and 1991 was that 
people do  have to be very careful in what they wish for.

Personally, I see improvement in the lives of the 99% happening not through 
revolution but little by little.  Though the road has not been easy, a 
considerable part of the world has come a long way in the provision of 
education and health care and in looking after the unemployed and the indigent. 
 Often, it has been a process of one step forward and two steps backward but 
things have generally moved in a positive direction.  However, we do have a 
long way to go.  Much still needs to be done.

Ed

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Ray Harrell 
  To: 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION,EDUCATION' 
  Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2012 9:34 PM
  Subject: Re: [Futurework] [Ottawadissenters] RE: Will it ever happen?


  Years ago the great English Diction coach Dorothy Uris was hired to go to the 
Soviet Union to teach English Diction to the Bolshoi.   She was one my mentors 
at Manhattan School of Music.    When she came back we had dinner and she spoke 
about what she had learned by about their Communism.   She had gotten ill while 
there and was treated by their medical system.    

   

  She was assigned a person to care for her other than the hospital staff.   A 
person who brought her tea, chatted and generally kept her spirits up.    She 
looked at me and said surprisingly, they are a country that has decided to do 
without wealthy folks.    She said that once they retired they had the same as 
everyone else.    Whether they liked that or not has been the discussion here 
about dachas and privileges but there is a funny anecdote here.   I remember 
Nancy Reagan saying at the Hermitage that she understood the revolution against 
such opulence in the face of such poverty.    Today I tried to find the quote 
and found another that said the opposite.   Strange!   Memory is not always 
correct but it came in the midst of questions about American Indians from 
Russian Students and silly statements by Reagan.   I remember thinking that 
Nancy had gotten it but then it seems she didn't.   Or maybe, like at other 
times, it was changed. 

   

  Meanwhile Dorothy felt that they had less technological medical facilities 
but more human and felt that they were healing of her.    She also understood 
the power of beurocracy and its inertia although she was impressed with the 
power of the Soviet Performing Arts.    Something that Americas were taught as 
being staid, threadbare and oppressive.   We've seen the lie of that in the 
Soviet Artists here in America who came from that system.     Still Civil 
Servants and human competitiveness are powerful problems for all governments to 
solve and make work. 

   

  REH   

   

  From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of michael gurstein
  Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2012 3:29 PM
  To: [email protected]; 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME 
DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION'
  Subject: Re: [Futurework] [Ottawadissenters] RE: Will it ever happen?

   

  I think that one of the major problems/failings in thinking about 
"revolution" is to see the desireable outcome as an end state--equality of all, 
etc.etc.  Rather the most desireably outcome of a revolution would be a 
process. a becoming . a process of enablement, of empowerment, of achieving 
rather than of achievement. When seen in that light we can discuss partial 
"revolutions", localized "revolutions", and so on. The critique of the 1% then 
becomes not a critique of who they are or what they own but rather how their 
control prevents processes of enablement/empowerment/realization to occur.

   

  M

   

   

  From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ed Weick
  Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2012 2:14 PM
  To: [email protected]; 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME 
DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION'
  Subject: Re: [Ottawadissenters] RE: [Futurework] Will it ever happen?

   

    

  Not quite sure of what I mean.  The idea of a revolution is to transcend the 
miserable state a people are in and to create a much better and more 
egalitarian world.  But does it really ever happen?  The Enlightenment led to 
the French Revolution, huge head choppings, and the Napoleonic Wars.  The 
Russian revolution resulted in the hugely repressive Stalinist state.  The 
American Revolution has resulted in the 99% vs. the 1%.  The ideals of Chairman 
Mao have led to repressive state capitalism.  What I'm trying to say is what 
John Gray said far better than I could in his "Black Mass" -- revolutionary 
ideals never turn out the way they were supposed to, and do be careful what you 
wish for.

   

  What, for example, should the 99% vs. the 1% result in?  Even if major 
reforms were instituted, it would probably not go much further than 98% vs. 2%. 
 A happy 100% egalitarian world is a complete fantasy.  The reason I used a 
quote from the 1970's and one from this year is to demonstrate that things 
haven't really changed very much.  It was hippies then, occupiers now.

   

  Yours from the dark side,

  Ed

   

   

    ----- Original Message ----- 

    From: Arthur Cordell 

    To: 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION' ; 
[email protected] 

    Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2012 1:09 PM

    Subject: [Ottawadissenters] RE: [Futurework] Will it ever happen?

     

      

    Not to be too trite, but what do you mean by  "will anything ever really 
happen?"

    From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ed Weick
    Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2012 12:43 PM
    To: 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION'; 
[email protected]
    Subject: [Futurework] Will it ever happen?

    A couple of quotes:

    THE REVOLUTION of the twentieth century will take place in the United 
States. It is only there that it can happen. And it has already begun. 'Whether 
or not that revolution spreads to the rest of the world depends on whether or 
not it succeeds first in America.

    I am not unaware of the shock and incredulity such statements may cause at 
every level of the European Left and among the nations of the Third World. I 
know it is difficult to believe that America-the fatherland of imperialism, the 
power responsible for the war in Vietnam, the nation of Joe McCarthy's witch 
hunts, the exploiter of the world's natural resources-is, or could become, the 
cradle of revolution.  (Jean Francois Revel, Without Marx or Jesus, the new 
American revolution has begun, 1970)

    The Occupy movements are the physical embodiment of hope. They returned us 
to a world where empathy is a primary attribute. They defied the profit-driven 
hierarchical structures of corporate capitalism. They know hope has a cost, 
that it is not easy or comfortable, that it requires self-sacrifice and 
discomfort and finally faith. In Zuccotti Park and throughout the they slept on 
concrete every night. Their clothes were soiled. They ate more bagels and 
peanut butter than they ever thought possible. They tasted fear, were beaten, 
went to jail, were blinded by pepper spray, cried, hugged each laughed, sung, 
talked too long in general assemblies, saw their chants drift upward to the 
office towers above them, wondered if it is worth it, if anyone cared if they 
would win.  (Chris Hedges and Joe Sacco, Days of Destruction, Days of Revolt, 
2012)

    A question:

    Hope does seem to spring eternal in the revolutionary breast, but will 
anything ever really happen?

    Ed

  __._,_.___

  Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post | Start a New Topic 

  Messages in this topic (4) 

  Recent Activity: 

  Visit Your Group 



  Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest . Unsubscribe . Terms of Use

  .



  __,_._,___



------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  Futurework mailing list
  [email protected]
  https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to