At 10:19 06-08-2012 -0400, you wrote:
>Hi, Viggo,
>
>Yes, the occupation regime puts many obstacles int he way of couples 
>who want to marry in Israel/Palestine, and even between Palestinians 
>who are living within the boundary of Israel, and those living on the 
>West Bank or Gaza.  (A wonderful movie: THE SYRIAN BRIDE who are 
>curious about one way in which it works (and in which good people from 
>all sides make it work.)  But love has a way, and the obstacle are 
>often surmounted with tenacity and patience.

Thanks a lot, Lawry, I'll do everything in my power to track down that
movie, which I had never heard about (oh, the sweet sweet blessing of
the Internet! if it is anywhere in cyperspace I'll find it and get it.) 

Viggo.

>Cheers,
>Lawry
>
>
>On Aug 6, 2012, at 8:48 AM, Viggo Andersen wrote:
>
>> Lawry, as to "Or an interpersonal level, Israelis and Palestinians 
>(and Arabs/Muslims) generally can get along fairly easily. Indeed I 
>know of many deep and lasting friendships between them, including marriages." 
>> 
>> Where have they settled down, married couples? I have a YouTube 
>> video about Israeli/Palestinian couple Jasmin Avissar and Osama 
>> Zatar from November 2008, German tv. They had to move to Germany 
>> to be able to live together. I also know about groups in Israel 
>> of psychologists or what they were doing "intervention" actions 
>> to "save" Israeli girls from their Palestinian boyfriends.
>> 
>> Viggo. 
>> 
>> At 08:25 06-08-2012 -0400, de Bivort Lawrence wrote:
>>> Good morning, Keith.  Yes, Muslims view Jews, Christians (broadly 
>defined) and Muslims all as "Ahl al-Kitab" -- People of the Book. All 
>the early converts to Islam were, of course, Jewish, Christian, or 
>pan- and polytheistic. Converting to Islam was not difficult for Jews 
>and Christians, as they and Muslims have the same god. So conversion 
>simply meant understanding that Muhammad was the most recent of the 
>prophets/messengers/ sent by God/Yahweh/Allah, and taking the Qur'an 
>as the last and literal message/voice of Allah.  If you will, you can 
>think of Muhammad and the Quran as the 'latest edition.'
>>> 
>>> Would you say more about the effect of Sunni-Shi'a tension on 
>Muslim-non-Muslim relations?  Thanks.
>>> 
>>> My sense is, and this summarizes many disparate conversations with 
>Arabs/Muslims about Israel, is not that Israeli technological and 
>scientific success provokes them against Israel, but that the seizure 
>of Palestine; the current onerous and murderous occupation; the 
>Israeli black ops against Arabs and Muslim countries; and the 1948, 
>1956, and 1967 wars are the cause of such anger at Israel.
>>> 
>>> Israel's technological succes is something that many Palestinians, 
>Arabs and Muslims admire, though the relative debauchery of some 
>segments of the Israeli Jewish population do not.  Of course, the 
>Arabs have their own record of world-class debauchery among some of 
>their elites -- a source of considerable resentment and contempt among 
>the general population.
>>> 
>>> Or an interpersonal level, Israelis and Palestinians (and 
>Arabs/Muslims) generally can get along fairly easily. Indeed I know of 
>many deep and lasting friendships between them, including marriages.
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Lawry
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Aug 6, 2012, at 7:11 AM, Keith Hudson wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Muhammad enjoined his followers to treat Jews and Christians with 
>respect, as fellow believers in the Bible (that is, the old testament) 
>and partners of the Abrahamic line. What has coloured Muslim's 
>attitude to non-Muslims is a byproduct of the growing overlay of 
>antipathy between the Sunnis and Shias of their own faith. Also, I 
>feel sure that the scientific and technological successes of Israel in 
>recent years, rather than its mere existence, have been provocative. 
>>>> 
>>>> Keith
>>>> 
>>>> At 20:53 05/08/2012, Arthur wrote:
>>>>> Just to provide some more perspective on the very unstable middle east.  
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Israel, the Arab world’s all-purpose enemy
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> <http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/author/gjonasnp/>George Jonas | 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Aug 4, 2012 6:01 AM ET |
>>>>> 
>>>>> Last Updated: Aug 4, 2012 9:48 AM ET
>>>>> 
>>>>> National Post
>>>>> 
>>>>> And how is the Arab Spring? Well, there’s bad news, and good 
>news. The bad news is that since the beginning of the phenomenon that 
>has been discussed more and understood less than any in recent years, 
>hostility to Israel in the region has only increased. The good news is 
>that while the appetite to harm the Jewish state and its inhabitants 
>has grown in the Arab/Muslim world since the fall of Zine el-Abidine 
>Ben Ali in Tunisia launched what was supposed to be the region’s 
>democratic renewal, the capacity to do so has diminished.
>>>>> 
>>>>> An increase in hostility was predictable. Hatred against Israel, 
>kept on a low boil, is the organizing principle of the Middle East. 
>It’s the region’s main fuel of governance; often its only fuel. Some 
>ruling regimes ­ kings, dictators, whatever ­ may have oil wells and 
>sandy beaches, but other than hating Israel (and looking after their 
>families and tribes) they have few if any ideas. If they do, chances 
>are it’s to hate some other group in addition to Israel.
>>>>> 
>>>>> In the Middle East a country’s national purpose often amounts to 
>little more than a list of its enemies. A feeling of being ill-done by 
>dominates the consciousness of groups and individuals. Since it’s a 
>self-fulfilling prophecy, it’s not necessarily baseless: The easiest 
>way to have an enemy is to be one.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The centrality of hatred to the culture is remarkable. The 
>Cartesian idea is “I hate, therefore I am.” Self-righteousness is 
>overwhelming: each desire thwarted becomes an example of justice 
>denied. It’s not a pretty place, but millions call it home.
>>>>> 
>>>>> In many ways, Israel is a godsend to the one-trick ponies who 
>rule the region. Their culture defines “ruling” as inoculating your 
>own sect or tribe against all others, including the ones that form 
>your own country. Many Middle East nations ­ Iraq, Syria, Libya, to 
>name three ­ are just temporarily halted civil wars. They’re truces 
>rather than countries. Canada may be “two solitudes,” but it isn’t an 
>uneasy truce between French and English Canadians. Iraq is, between 
>Shia and Sunni Muslims.
>>>>> 
>>>>> In such an ambiance, nothing is handier than an all-purpose 
>enemy, just out of reach, close enough to seem a realistic threat but 
>too far to be one. Tyrants can govern by whipping up enough popular 
>sentiment against the Jewish state to give their regimes an apparent 
>national purpose and distract people’s attention from domestic woes, 
>then relax and spend some money in the capitals of Europe.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The key is a low boil, though. If the anti-Israeli sentiment 
>boils over, causing riots against the government for being too soft on 
>the Zionists, or foolish attempts to attack Haifa with rockets, which 
>in turn invites retaliation, the people’s hatred of Israel becomes a 
>headache for the very rulers who instigated it.
>>>>> 
>>>>> “Yeah, well, it couldn’t happen to a nicer bunch,” somebody might 
>say, “I’ll lose no sleep over it.” He should, though, because it’s 
>like pulling a thread from a piece of fabric. Things can unravel in an instant.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Tyranny, Egyptian-style, under Hosni Mubarak or Libyan-style, 
>under Muammar Gaddafi, often manifested itself in dictatorial 
>governments balancing on a tightrope, trying to maintain a fragile 
>peace with Israel against their own bellicose people, trying to 
>counteract the effects of the sentiments they themselves instigated. 
>When they couldn’t, the forces they helped conjure up turned against 
>them. If lucky, they died in a hail of bullets on the reviewing stand 
>like Anwar Sadat; if not, bludgeoned like a cornered rat in a culvert, 
>in the manner of Gaddafi. It’s a fate Bashar al-Assad has been trying 
>to avoid, which is hardly surprising.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Assad “has threatened to rain missiles down on Tel Aviv should 
>NATO try to dislodge him,” as 
><http://nationalinterest.org/commentary/how-the-arab-spring-keeps-isra>el-safe-7268>Michael
> Koplow put it in the National Interest, but in 
>fact Syria’s tyrant has been raining missiles (and if not missiles, 
>then shells and bullets) on his own towns and villages. No wonder, for 
>that’s where his enemies live ­ his actual enemies, as opposed to his 
>mythical ones. It’s his fellow Syrians who want to trap him in a 
>culvert and drown him, preferably along with his entire tribe. Israel 
>has no interest in touching him with a 10-foot pole, especially as 
>long as he’s keeping Syria’s armed forces and rebels thinning each 
>other’s ranks.
>>>>> 
>>>>> We won’t understand much about the Arab Spring as long as we 
>persist in looking at it through Western eyes. We see popular 
>uprisings against dictatorships as moves in the direction of 
>Western-style democracy. If they happened here, they probably would 
>be. Where they’re actually happening they’re taking their societies in 
>the opposite direction.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The Arab Spring is an attempt to return the region to its roots. 
>It’s not to Westernize the Middle East and make it more democratic; 
>it’s to Easternize it and make it more Islamic. If the early 20th 
>century was about the East trying to join what it couldn’t lick, the 
>early 21st may be about the East trying to lick what it hasn’t been 
>able to join.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Futurework mailing list
>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]
>>>>> https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
>>>> 
>>>> Keith Hudson, Saltford, England http://allisstatus.wordpress.com
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Futurework mailing list
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]
>>>> https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Futurework mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Futurework mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Futurework mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework


_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to